commentary: the best way to fix u.s. diplomacy - what are the best earphones
S. foreign policy is at a crossroads.
There are two possible ways forward: exit from the world as a result of the Trump administration's proposal to cut the budget for international affairs, or reaffirm that by a competent, modern state department and a powerful, adequate --funded U. S.
International Development Agency (UNDP (USAID).
For our former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the former deputy secretary of state, the choice seems clear.
International participation is in the economic and security interests of the United States and we must support our civil institutions in their respective unique and mutual
Strengthen the task.
If the real purpose of the Trump administration's restructuring of the State Department and USAID is to narrow down the role of our foreign civilians or force them to merge, the national security of the United States will be greatly affected by the policy body.
What is needed is thoughtful reforms that enhance our foreign policy capabilities and strength through fully mandated and coordinated diplomatic and development functions.
The Trump administration should recognize reforms to improve costs
The effectiveness of our international program has received wide bipartisan support from members of Congress as well as from development and diplomacy professionals.
Given the global challenges we face, revisiting our foreign policy architecture can translate into more strategic engagement with our partners around the world.
A recent report of the Atlantic Council (
Ambassador Pickering is one of the authors)
The previous restructuring efforts did not "take into account the increasing number of U. S.
Success must depend on missions that make a comprehensive use of different but equally effective means of defense, diplomacy and development.
"The recent national security strategy recognizes the importance of foreign assistance to global health security, access to energy and the rights of women and girls, but does not provide a comprehensive picture, foreign aid is often seen only as a tool for the United States to pursue its interests overseas.
The implementation of such a policy almost certainly negates the long-term development and humanitarian objectives of foreign aid in the short term.
Reform should adhere to both diplomacy and development.
The mission, culture and capacity of the Department of State and USAID vary.
In order for each institution to reach its full potential, clear authority and accountability must be developed.
Simply merging the functions of the National and United States Agency for International Development does not solve the problem of fragmentation and duplication.
Rather, by clarifying these differences, including the United States Agency for International Development's budget and policy mandate, a more coherent foreign policy will be achieved so that each agency can focus on its core tasks.
S. director of international development and former ambassador Mark Green are the president's wise choice to lead the U. S. ambassador to Afghanistan. S.
At the House Appropriations subcommittee hearing last fall, it was reiterated that the purpose of foreign aid was to create conditions that were no longer needed.
In order to achieve this valuable goal, it is necessary to fully entrust the United States Agency for International Development to coordinate with Mark Green. S.
To enable countries to advance their development efforts.
Effective restructuring is an important opportunity to make lasting improvements to our foreign policy tools and institutions, but without congressional input, it cannot be achieved.
Keep in mind that Congress is strongly opposed to cutting funding from these institutions and that the government must work with members to provide a viable and productive alternative to the efficiency that the government is seeking correctly.
We know from experience that change can only be sustained through inclusive and cooperative inter-institutional processes, consultations with outside experts and bipartisan participation.
At this critical crossroads, we urge government officials, members of Congress, and the wider foreign policy community to work together to ensure that the diplomatic and development institutions of our country are capable of meeting today's global challenges, to achieve a safer, more stable and prosperous world.